2,205 Black Lives

Wow. Police killed 29 African Americans in 2014. I guess somehow, with all the BLM protesting, I expected that number to be much greater. I mean, not to be too coarse about it but that's a number that's less than the number of killed and wounded in San Bernardino by the ISIS couple last week.

Black Lives Matter, right? 

Now, having come across this: According to FBI data Blacks were responsible for killing 2,205 other Blacks in 2014. Now that's an alarmingly high number. And it's about 76 times more than the police tally.

But Black Lives Matter, right?

I'm asking again: do Black Lives really Matter to other Black folk? If so, why is this number so high?

I'm just asking. Because until a coherent answer is found, it seems to me to be a classic case of "physician heal thyself".

Preach when you've a REAL sermon. Protest when you've got a REAL moral argument. 

I need to put a sign up outside my house, or better yet, carry around a placard with the number 2,205 on it. Wonder if I'll get any media attention.

Soli Deo Gloria!

America is a gun-totin' nation

The simple answer to gun violence in America is two-fold: #1) we will need a moral, peace-loving citizenry. #2) we will need an armed citizenry.

Number 2 is needed in case Number 1 breaks down.

Unfortunately, in today's America, with morals having been greatly regressed, the peace that inevitably ensues when moral people dwell together has been disturbed. The Judeo-Christian moral fabric has been torn nearly in two. We have alarmingly high rates of domestic killings and we even have foreigners/immigrants killing Americans on American soil. The foundation of the law is cracked,and now even bedrock Constitutional rights are under assault.

The politics of our response to this problem is almost unbelievable. I shudder when I consider that there are many who agree with the President and the Left on the notion that disarming citizens and taking away their 2nd Amendment rights will protect citizens. Moreover, the idea that fewer guns among an immoral people will protect people is ludicrous.

And while I'm not a big fan of Ted Cruz, he's on top of it with this quote:

"Unfortunately, the goal of both President Obama and Hillary Clinton, is to consistently–at every turn–to look to weaken the constitutional rights of American citizens...to undermine our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. You don’t get rid of the bad guys by getting rid of our guns. You get rid of the bad guys by using our guns..." 

I'm all for peace and safety, but it cannot be had among an immoral people without force. Whether by law and order, or by the  private projection and use of force, peace simply cannot be had nor maintained any other way.


Soli Deo Gloria!

The Iran "Deal"

My summation of the Iran deal is what my gut is telling me. And although no one seems to know why President Obama wants this deal or why America is giving away so much to Iran, I think I know why. Of course, the givens are these: Obama dislikes America and its power over the rest of the world. As Dinesh D'Souza's movies about Obama have strongly suggested, he is all about taking America down a few notches - if not outright destroying the fabric that made her who she is today - the kind of country he and his friends (Communists & Socialists) think is responsible for everything wrong in the world. He wants to Europeanize America and transform the country by reverse engineering its fundamental values and structures of governing trust. He is doing a fine job in this arena.

But in the Middle East sits a curious foe of Obama. This foe of Obama is the very country to whom Americans have traditionally viewed as unabashedly pro-American in its style, its tastes, and  its love of democracy. In exchange for this adulation and special relationship this country has garnered American support, strategic interest, and protection. Moreover, the ties that bind America to the Middle East are its deep spiritual kinship and religious traditions with this country. Of course, I'm speaking of Israel.

However, Israel, in the eyes of Obama, and many others on the Left (and Right) think and believe Israel wields far too much power and influence over American institutions, over its banking systems, over its financial institutions, over its commerce, its entertainment industry, and over America's most powerful constitutional body: the US Congress. And Obama sees that America protects Israel and its interests far too much. So, as the most powerful man in the world, what does he do about it?   

If nothing else is known about Obama - it is this: he is cool, cunning, swift, isolating, and Hitlerian all at once. Even today - six years into his presidency - he is still an unknown! Nothing about him truly is as it appears to be - his faith, his marriage, his family, his dreams, loyalties. Nothing. One thing is known: he has spent much of his presidency dismantling America cohesion and its fabric of interlocking power. And he has successfully used its foundational institutions to give him even more power. But that isn't enough for him. His time as president is short, and he wants a legacy.

Obama knows there is one and only one country in the Middle East, who, armed with the technology, weapons, and money who can do the double duty for him. In continuing and furthering  the decline of American power, he needs this Middle Eastern country to need what he has to give. (That's why powerful Russia with an equally narcissistic leader isn't the country). This country has to hate America just like he does, but it also must hate Israel with an even more fervent passion because Israel influence stands in the way of the LAST rung of Obama's compete takeover of the halls of Congress.

Obama needs a strategic partner in taking out Israel AND his own country, AMERICA. And it is to that country he is giving the weapons of nuclear power and a blank check for arms trading.

That country is Iran.

But Iran has come about by fits and starts. Obama has sized up the Middle East.  Having desperately sought out a strategic partner to take out Israel, Obama created the Arab Spring. But it didn't turn out so good. Withdraw from Iraq. Check. Ungovernable chaos ensued, leading to sectarian warfare and the creation the most notorious "JV team" - ISIS. Next, depose Assad in Syria. Not quite a check. Coulda, woulda, shoulda, but Russia stood in the way to support Assad and his minority tribal rule. Arm the rebels against Assad. Check. Create a "red line" for Syria to cross. Check. (They cross it anyway thus exposing the weak willed Obama as a pansy to traditional American allies) Depose Qaddaffi. Check. Depose Mubarak in Egypt. Check.

Actually, Obama thought at first Egypt would be his dancing partner in opposing Israel. But as he discovered, the Egyptians both fear the Jews and secretly cooperate with them. Mubarak and Bibi were old friends. In truth, the Egyptians have a deep rooted undefinable fear of the Jews that goes back to Exodus, I think, but it was certainly reinforced in the '67 and '73 Wars. But in this Arab Spring, Obama discovered one thing: Hezbollah and Hamas could always be counted on to take the fight to Israel, no matter how suicidal it may be. Trouble was, they didn't have enough money to make their incursions sustainable. All the while, ISIS was racking up embarrassing headlines as the little terrorist organization that could. ISIS was the Middle East's tale of the tape. The Middle East's oil producing nations were on alert. Israel was on alert. Europe was on alert. Obama's refusal to engage them directly puzzled many. But I think I know why Obama refused to engage against them. A direct military engagement against ISIS would mean indirectly aiding with his enemy, Israel. It would bring an American presence back into the Middle East that would restore American honor at home and abroad and bring about a pride of place as a powerful nation that can do such things when it wants to. 

It was then that I believe Obama turned to Iran. But the sanctions against Iran limited its role as a major player. As a major check writer and supplier of arms and funds to Hezbollah and Hamas, it could not carry out the war for all time (the Mahdi War) that Ahmedinejhad wanted.

I think Bibi Netanyahu's speech to the US Congress represented a triumph of Israel over Obama that sent him into a Hitlerian rage. His dislike and even perhaps hatred for Bibi Netanyahu was fired into white heat at the repeated standing ovations Bibi's Purim Address to Congress generated. That, I believe, pushed Obama over the edge and maybe the next morning he made the phone call to the Iranian emissaries. You want your international sanctions lifted? I'll lift them. You want billions in  monetary aid? I'll give you millions, even billions. You want nukes? I'll give you nukes. You don't want us to inspect your enrichment sites? We won't.

You want to keep cursing America and Israel? You may continue. Now we have a deal. Iran, you are now steps away from being a world power. I will now "deal" with the Congress.

But this "deal" with Iran is no deal. That's why it's so one-sided in favor of Iran. that's why American got no PERSONAL concessions out of it. That's why the four American hostages weren't even discussed. This DEAL is the DAGGER of a vindictive president. He plans to use American power, technology, and money - funneled through a vicious, unrepentant enemy - to destroy Israel. In effect, America would destroy her ally. How brilliant! How nefarious! Using the exceptional nation to destroy the holy nation. To also repay the Jews, to repay Netanyahu, for his insolence and disrespect of a sitting Black President!. (I'll show those Jews!)

But, alas, like Haman in the Book of Esther, it is a plot that is seen by those whom God loves and will probably be thwarted by those whom God loves - or by God Himself - unless Obama reveals himself truly as a man of deep anti-semitism, as this article suggests.

Or, as I have come to suspect - and am increasingly convinced he is - The MAN OF SIN. And if he is...then all one has to do is go to the Bible to 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10 to find out what the Man of SIN must be up to.

In Him I live, I move, and have my being! See ya LATER!!

Obama: the Iranian Mullah's Prophetic Quisling

This article appeared in Forbes magazine in October 2008 just before Obama's election in November 2008. Somehow, a 17th century Shiite mullah writer and cleric apparently predicted Obama's rise and power and his favorable dealings with Iran.

I'm not sure if the prophecy is true or not, but the article points out things that have come to pass even since 2008.

So either the 17th century cleric was right and this Iranian-arming deal by Barack Hussein Obama is truly a remarkable piece of prophecy coming to pass, or if he was wrong, then the article's writer is the real  prophet - only from 2008, mind you - but still it is amazingly prescient in seeing how things have come about with this president and our country and the nation of Iran.

  http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/26/obama-iran-ahmadinejad-oped-cx_at_1026taheri.html

Dinesh D'Souza to see yet another court-ordered shrink

Good grief. Have we come to this level of Soviet-style punishment?  Dinesh is an outspoken critic of Obama and the Left. So what? Lots of people are disgusted with where the Left and Obama has taken this country. I have personally loved D'Souza's work, his books, and his movies.

And yes, he committed a felony in trying to bundle donors to help a friend's failed senate campaign.

He did his time.

Now He's being tortured by a left-wing judge's ruling that he do MORE counseling than the amount he has already undergone -  from TWO psychiatrists. http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/psych-major-judge-overrides-doctors-on-dsouza/

This is a new low in punitive style justice in Obama's leftist America. There is more doom and gloom to come.

Benghazi, the IRS Scandal, the VA disaster, it goes on...

Operation Destroy America via mass Mexican and Central American immigration has infested the Southwestern US with criminals and drug lords. 

A foolhardy foreign policy that will soon hand Iran a nuclear bomb. No, I said IRAN.

Homosexuals and the Media now direct the power of justice and law.

 America really is doomed. It really is...

How did this happen?

Here is an article that pretty much sums up my understanding of things. I may be wrong, but then again, I may be right.This gentleman seems right.

Defeat, Disillusionment, and Disaster - a portent of trouble ahead for the USA

America has fallen! America has fallen! America has fallen!

The Supreme Court's sad and wretched ruling on Friday legalizing homosexual marriage rights will now reshape marriage and our civil society and community. It will permanently mar the landscape of gender, gender norms, and the raising of children. By making perversion normative, the new norm of the Public Square is lawful perversion. Honorable? No. Dignified? No. But legal perversion is now a civil right - because the Highest Court of Law in the Land has made it so. 

What next? Because the essence of perversion is the Lie, and the Father of Lies is behind the Sexual Revolution which created this embryonic perversion of the marriage gift, the enemy now has his foothold by lawful means into the deepest institution of life - the family.  And here is where the persecution begins. Here is where people of serious faith, of honest conscientious dissent, who are filled with the Spirit, washed by the Blood of Jesus, and filled with His love are now marked for confrontation, persecution, and ultimate destruction by this Enemy. It will be a "scorched America" policy, you can take it to the bank. All will go down with it.

Soon, people of faith will be on the run, retreating into hiding from the government's eye. (And thank we now our God that Obamacare has revealed to us all that our government kommissars are an increasingly incompetent lot!) It is very possible and indeed probable that China's underground churches will be replicated in the United States because only the Perverse Churches, akin to the government approved Three-Self Churches of China, will be allowed to publicly and openly practice "faith" without penalty.

Like the German Volken watching the Nazi parades in the early years prior to their taking power in 1933, I watched this growing Gay Movement with much trepidation and wonder a few years back. And I asked myself, Where will it go? How far will it go? Where will it take America? Will people of sound mind, noble virtue, or just plain ol' decency stop this thing in its tracks before it affects our children? And some people tried, but no voice was found to stop it. Opposition failed miserably.

Now Gay Pride has risen to power. Not supreme power, but very close to it. The Law has granted it power enough to no longer worry about costs or potential for ruin. And why should the Gays care about any of that? Having lived disaffected lives for so long its adherents don't mind disaffecting the rest of us. The country and the people be damned. Because the Enemy is behind this, it will come to pass.  

Well, enough. I must now close this most cathartic of screeds. 

I need prayer! Won't y'all pray for me? I am really depressed for my country. Nothing sums up my dismay and fear for the fate of all believing Christians in the United States now more than this article. It gives me some hope, but it has injected a sense of stark and fateful reality into my veins.

We may have to pray and worship differently. But we must never agree with Perversion. Nor can we recant because of the power it now holds.

Rachel Dolezal in the Amazing Race!

This is a strange and fascinating case regarding Rachel Dolezal. But it is not easy to untangle what she has done, given the social developments of the past 60 years. It is "reverse-passing" as I see it. To this point I commend (3) fundamental assumptions with this case that Ms. Dolezal either challenges or reinforces.

The SOCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL Assumption - Race is a social construct and therefore can be socially deconstructed. Or, is the "One-Drop" Rule still in effect?

1. Premise A: The "one-drop" rule defining blackness legally was based upon obviously racist and therefore unsound reasoning. If this is true, then "Blackness" cannot be essentially measured, but can only be socially measured - unless we as a society are intending to perpetuate Jim Crow assumptions of "essential" Black-ness. Ms. Dolezal was testing how far she could go with her SOCIAL "Blackness", i.e., graduating from an HBCU, teaching courses on African Studies, seeking leadership positions in a traditionally Black institution - NONE of this was illegal. Rather, how she defined herself went against the institutional assumption of the Black institutions, i.e., the NAACP and against the social assumptions of who we ARE allowed to say we are. In her case, she committed a social crime in not identifying to society at large - and continuing to identify, if not live out the privileges of her race at birth. In other words, how dare she live beneath her her privilege!

2. Premise B: In a major irony, Black society and institutions have staked much of their existence on the "one-drop" rule. Groups like the NAACP and others assume and perpetuate racial classifications for institutional purposes but are inadvertently continuing the Jim Crow classifications of "essential" blackness. Of course, these institutions do not do this for the active perpetuation of Jim Crow, but in an attempt to REVERSE the modern effects of Jim Crow (affirmative action, minority set asides, and "minority" positions, for example). However, in an attempt to destroy evil - evil must live on as a frame of reference. In other words, we are thus forced - for the time being and for some time in the future - to accept and recognize the evil of Jim Crow. Jim Crow society insisted that blackness go back to at least 1/16th of a person's heritage. Further than that, race becomes socially benign and unimportant. Thus the "essentialness" of race (one-drop rule) has its limits even in Jim Crow. What's more amazing is that Rachel Dolezal sought to challenge the affirmative action policies of Howard University as a White woman! And I guess she figured if you can't beat 'em, join 'em - and thus today has challenged the social side of institutional race classification with the NAACP. She seemed dead-serious, too.

The IDENTITY Assumption - Identity Theory says you are who and what YOU say you are - not what society or anyone else may say you are.

1. Premise A: If the transgendered can have a gender identity change even before surgery, then why can't race identity be changed? (Bruce Jenner are you with me?) This is a rock-solid claim emerging from modern psychology and the reparative mental therapy movement within that discipline. The theory is simple enough: by affirming the good, the mind can replace the mental state which has trended towards that which is harmful. Psychology and social theory later enmeshed to use these techniques to project idealistic states onto social evils, including race. For example, by asking "aren't we all from the same race?" the adherents seek to minimize and neutralize differences and promote human union and social harmony. By allowing people to affirm whatever gender or race they choose to call themselves, the belief is that we'll all begin to see how flimsy and unimportant those "evil" classifications truly are. After all, how can Michael Jackson bleach his skin and not be challenged by the Black community, yet a White woman darkens her skin and has to defend her actions from critics charging her with resurrecting a type of modern Amos and Andy-like "Birth of a Nation" minstrelsy?

2. Premise B: Before we get too smug about it, Christianity is also awash in Identity Theory. We Christians make claims about ourselves all the time that are not true from evidence. Indeed, the Bible tells us to do this. The belief that Christians are a "chosen people and a royal priesthood" for example is based upon Identity Theory found in the Old Testament. We call those things that are not as though they were is based upon New Testament biblical grounds. And if so, then why can't Identity Theory be expanded to include race classifications? Ms. Dolezal staked her social and professional life upon the deep truth found in Identity Theory.

The LEGAL Assumption - the laws of the U.S. have been affected to adhere to racial classifications, i.e. the government wants to know your racial classification.

1. PREMISE A: Any time you fill out a legal document and a classification of race is asked, if you were to misrepresent yourself you would be subject to perjury charges. The reason, as stated above, is that the law of the land is still fighting the effects of Jim Crow, but in order to fight the good fight - the memory of the evil system must be invoked. Now, the perpetrators of the Jim Crow system, i.e., White males, have grudgingly accepted the fact that a system is needed to fix the inequality which emerged from Jim Crow. U.S. law courts have affirmed this repeatedly in some key decisions in our day. The challenge is that the systems which have emerged legally are not perfectly spelled out. And why is this? Because the legal counter-challenges to them use the language that racial classifications are essentially racist in theory. Thus for practical reasons, the Justice Department has construed its federal laws to say "non-disciminatory" not favoring a one race over another - while simultaneously acknowledging that society has an interest in certain racial outcomes to fix Jim Crow. The legal defense of race law is not a good one, but it's a necessary evil. Thus you will continue to see forms in which race and race classifications are asked, but there will be a disclaimer stating non-discrimination based upon race, gender, creed, national origin, etc. These forms become your racial documentation, so to speak. The cynics among the White males, the losers in all this racial redress, will insist upon a fixed definition of race so as to get a clear picture of how far and how long their social and legal status as an "oppressor" will be. 

2. The legal assumption that being Black must have some kind of documented or socially affirmed status is what enrages Black people when Whites try to assume Black personage. As someone said, Ms. Dolezal can CHANGE her status, but Blacks cannot. But I'd argue even that SOME Blacks cannot, but SOME Blacks CAN. As long as there have been light-skinned Black people "passing" for White, SOME Blacks can get away with being White. While we all have known Blacks who are socially White and are "lost" inside and into the White social class, they cannot escape their birth certificates nor their appearances. But some light-skinned Blacks have (in New Orleans for example) lived in quiet secrecy all their lives to such a degree that it would take a close family member to "out" them. That's just who they have become, but if race were included on their Drivers Licenses we would know the truth. Ms. Dolezal was "outed" on national TV, which brought us to this discussion.

My take is that while Ms. Dolezal went as far as she could to live the life of Black experience, this case ironically suggests a certain positive status for minority person-hood in that a White woman would sacrifice her White privilege - in the U.S. no less - to be Black and be thus of a diminished social status as a U.S. citizen. But really and truly: I blame her parents in not explaining to her the rash of Black child adoptions they did perhaps while Rachel was a little girl. It is obvious to me that she took all of the Black adoptions as a rejection of her White-ness and sought to win her parents' affection and affirmation for who she was not, rather than for who she was. This is a classic case of "reverse-passing".

Beware of Obama is Right!

To the people of Israel, I offer my sincerest apologies for the tyrant my countrymen have elected as President of the United States. It is true, he was chosen democratically - as Germany chose Hitler perhaps. But our great sin is that we chose him twice. Now, many Americans are sorry and filled with regret. Like Hitler's grip over Germany tightened, Obama's grip on America is choking out our lifeblood. He is far worse than most of us thought he'd be. As for Israel, our staunchest ally in the Middle East, Obama is set to turn his wrath on you. Read NY Post columnist Michael Goodwin's words:

First he comes for the banks and health care, uses the IRS to go after critics, politicizes the Justice Department, spies on journalists, tries to curb religious freedom, slashes the military, throws open the borders, doubles the debt and nationalizes the Internet. He lies to the public, ignores the Constitution, inflames race relations and urges Latinos to punish Republican “enemies.” He abandons our ­allies, appeases tyrants, coddles ­adversaries and uses the Crusades as an excuse for inaction as Islamist terrorists slaughter their way across the Mideast. Now he’s coming for Israel.Barack Obama’s promise to transform America was too modest. He is transforming the whole world before our eyes. Do you see it yet? Against the backdrop of the tsunami of trouble he has unleashed, Obama’s pledge to “reassess” America’s relationship with Israel cannot be taken lightly. Already paving the way for an Iranian nuke, he is hinting he’ll also let the other anti-Semites at Turtle Bay have their way. That could mean American support for punitive Security Council resolutions or for Palestinian statehood initiatives. It could mean both, or something worse. Whatever form the punishment takes, it will aim to teach Bibi Netanyahu never again to upstage him. And to teach Israeli voters never again to elect somebody Obama doesn’t like. Apologists and wishful thinkers, including some Jews, insist Obama real­izes that the special relationship between Israel and the United States must prevail and that allowing too much daylight between friends will encourage enemies. Those people are slow learners, or, more dangerously, deny-ists. If Obama’s six years in office teach us anything, it is that he is impervious to appeals to good sense. Quite the contrary. Even respectful suggestions from supporters that he behave in the traditions of American presidents fill him with angry determination to do it his way. For Israel, the consequences will be intended. Those who make excuses for Obama’s policy failures — naive, bad advice, bad luck — have not come to grips with his dark impulses and deep-seated rage. His visceral dislike for Netanyahu is genuine, but also serves as a convenient fig leaf for his visceral dislike of Israel. The fact that it’s personal with Netanyahu doesn’t explain six years of trying to bully Israelis into signing a suicide pact with Muslims bent on destroying them. Netanyahu’s only sin is that he puts his nation’s security first and refuses to knuckle ­under to Obama’s endless demands for unilateral concessions. That refusal is now the excuse to act against Israel. Consider that, for all the upheaval around the world, the president rarely has a cross word for, let alone an open dispute with, any other foreign leader. He calls Great Britain’s David Cameron “bro” and praised Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president, Mohammed Morsi, who had called Zionists “the descendants of apes and pigs.” Most troubling is Obama’s bended-knee deference to Iran’s Supreme Leader, which has been repaid with “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” demonstrations in Tehran and expanded Iranian military action in other countries. The courtship reached the height of absurdity last week, when Obama wished Iranians a happy Persian new year by equating Republican critics of his nuclear deal with the resistance of theocratic hard-liners, saying both “oppose a diplomatic solution.” That is a damnable slur given that a top American military official estimates that Iranian weapons, proxies and trainers killed 1,500 US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Who in their right mind would trust such an evil regime with a nuke? Yet Netanyahu, the leader of our only reliable ally in the region, is ­repeatedly singled out for abuse. He alone is the target of an orchestrated attempt to defeat him at the polls, with Obama political operatives, funded in part by American taxpayers, working to elect his opponent. They failed and Netanyahu prevailed because Israelis see him as their best bet to protect them. Their choice was wise, but they’d better buckle up because it’s Israel’s turn to face the wrath of Obama. As we've seen before, he is friend to those nations we previously called enemies. In fact, Iran still calls America it's enemy. And yet President Obama is still interested in giving Iran a nuclear weapon. Therefore, in my judgment President Obama is placing not only America at national security risk, but Israel's national existence at risk.

Obama does not, has not, and never will love America. Because of his Marxist, pro-Muslim upbringing, the Judeo-Christian worldview is and always has been anathema to him. In keeping with his worldview, Israel, the "Judeo" of the Judeo-Christian worldview, must be wiped out. And guess what - Iran has pledged this in every word it utters. Like Cato of the Roman Republic who declared at the end of every speech that Carthage must be destroyed, so Iran bellows an endless chant of Death to America and Death to Israel. And as Obama has clipped American power to protect Israel's existential presence in the region, he now turns his attention to aid those who intend to destroy her outright or to remove from power (Bibi) those who intend to protect and preserve the Jewish state. 

This is beyond nefarious. This makes Obama a master deceiver. Moreover, he is a master deceiver of  Hitlerian cunning occupying the seat of the world's most powerful (for now) office. And if I didn't have my notions about the antichrist elsewhere, I'd say Barack Obama is the closest to being the antichrist as I have seen in my lifetime.

I'm a Christian and a believer. I trust in God's providential protection of Israel. So we shall see. My prayer is that God gives us (America & Israel) the strength to endure such lunatic foreign policy making and gives the American people - particularly the Republican Party in current control of the Congress - the backbone to withstand his every move and intention.

Netanyahu Speaks to the US Congress on the eve of Purim

What an awesome, gracious, and moving speech by Bibi Netanyahu today. I was struck at how petty our President and his Administration seemed in denigrating the Prime Minister's efforts at merely speaking to the People of the United States of America. Why the blockage? Why the naysaying chatter? Why prevent this speech? It was glowing on the issue of American support of Israel. It was truth-telling. It was a dire warning to the American people about the nature of the regime with which the US is in close negotiations regarding nuclear power and weapons. It basically said that the same "Death to America" nation Iran was before - it is now. And now even ISIS is a competitor regime - a regime intent on destroying Western Civilization and returning the world to a 7th century caliphate. Bibi was just reminding us of the developments that have taken place just in the last two years. And our President sought to stop and disrupt Netanyahu's speech to Congress. Amazing. 

I have always said that President Obama is unworthy of the office he now occupies. However I now think him to be an anti-Semite. Again and again, he has supported Islam over Christianity. Judaism to him is even worse. Obama bows before the Saudi King yet sends Bibi the message that he can't stand him (note the crossed leg away from Bibi):

   


Amazing.

On this eve of the anniversary of the attempted pur of the Jews of Iran called Purim, perhaps it is time to consider that God intended this speech from Israel to America before He releases judgment on His covenant nation. Is it possible that for Obama to seek to prevent this message suggests he may be standing as one who seeks to oppose God? It is possible.

But I've said it before and I'll say it again, there is indeed a BLOOD BOND between Israel and America. I am not an Anglo-Israelite believer, but I think something biblically, spiritually, and viscerally "End Times" driven in this bi-national relationship.

And even though I can't explain it, I think our common enemies believe there is a bond there as well. So, since there is - let America's support for the Jewish nation and state continue unwaveringly for the sake and blessing of Abraham.

Remember Genesis 12:3!!

Charlie Hebdo

All I can say is.... my hatred of Islam and all that it stands for increases. I despise the religion. I despise the faith. I hate Islam because it hates freedom. It hates liberty. It is utterly incompatible with free societies everywhere. I am revulsed by the blood-thirstiness of the Koran. I am shocked and put off by the death romance of its most rabid followers. These are my personal feelings. I am emotional right now. As a Christian, I know I shouldn't hate, but it is a moral struggle for me that I am right now losing. Only the Cross can save me, I know.

The deniers of the seriousness of radical Islam and the serious problems in Islamic thinking have only enabled the continuing Muslim surge into the West. A quiet invasion that has preyed upon grace has metastasized. The Muslim incursion has become violent. It seeks to suppress free expression. An invasion into the HQ of a satirical journal has crossed the line of the welcome mat. What next? The newsroom? And after that, what? The boardroom?

To accept this is nonsense and madness. The only hope for France is good sense. The Front National - who speaks the truth about the problem is a start. Round 'em up. Deport them. Deny them a welcome. Denial now is enabling. Je suis Charlie!!